automation
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
automation [14/03/2023 18:52] – mike_gss | automation [05/05/2023 12:34] (current) – mike_gss | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ==== Recording and managing data – automation in biostratigraphy | + | ==== Recording and Managing Data – Automation In Biostratigraphy |
The sheer volume of data generated by biostratigraphers is extensive. Either generated academically or commercially, | The sheer volume of data generated by biostratigraphers is extensive. Either generated academically or commercially, | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | //The digital storage of biostratigraphical data only “got going” in the late 1980’s. The key database software, StrataBugs, came out of BP in the 1990’s. It is used by almost all Biostrat consultancies and many E&P companies that have biostratigraphers. RagWare & BugWare are primarily used by US based biostratigraphy consultancies. Biostratigraphical data interpretation software used in the industry stem from the Technical Alliance for Computation Stratigraphy (TACS) project run at EGI, Utah by Tony Gary.// | ||
Academics (in the loose sense) tend to be interested in the classification and evolutionary history of a particular set or subset of organisms and their biology/ | Academics (in the loose sense) tend to be interested in the classification and evolutionary history of a particular set or subset of organisms and their biology/ | ||
Line 18: | Line 22: | ||
Achieving taxonomic consistency in datasets is also a prerequisite to the development of automation in biostratigraphy, | Achieving taxonomic consistency in datasets is also a prerequisite to the development of automation in biostratigraphy, | ||
- | Data sets held by operating companies can be huge. The data may already have been interpreted “on paper” and indeed, data could potentially be re-interpreted (by a “thinking biostratigrapher”) at any future point. However, with more volumes of data becoming available and fewer and fewer biostratigraphers available to work with the data, the need for automation in biostratigraphic interpretation becomes clear. One promising approach towards automation in biostratigraphy would be to combine a “species dictionary” which deals with taxonomic issues, synonyms, an agreed geological age-range for individual species and genera and environmental descriptors, | + | Data sets held by operating companies can be huge. The data may already have been interpreted “on paper” and indeed, data could potentially be re-interpreted (by a “thinking biostratigrapher”) at any future point. However, with more volumes of data becoming available and fewer and fewer biostratigraphers available to work with the data, the need for automation in biostratigraphic interpretation becomes clear. One promising approach towards automation in biostratigraphy would be to combine a “species dictionary” which deals with taxonomic issues, synonyms, an agreed geological age-range for individual species and genera and environmental descriptors, |
+ | |||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | //A possible route to automation in biostratigraphy using a " | ||
automation.1678819940.txt.gz · Last modified: 14/03/2023 18:52 by mike_gss