paleoenv_typical
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revision | ||
paleoenv_typical [20/03/2023 10:25] – created mike_gss | paleoenv_typical [10/05/2023 14:53] (current) – mike_gss | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Predominantly based on benthonic organisms as these are more responsive to substrate conditions. However, the planktonic component of a fossil assemblage is useful for estimating paleodepths. | Predominantly based on benthonic organisms as these are more responsive to substrate conditions. However, the planktonic component of a fossil assemblage is useful for estimating paleodepths. | ||
- | Foraminifera (both benthonic and planktonic varieties) are the best microfossils to evaluate paleoenvironments. | + | Foraminifera (both benthonic and planktonic varieties) are the best microfossils to evaluate paleoenvironments. |
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | // | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | //Different shell shapes of planktonic forams (keeled or non-keeled) reflect habitat-differences in relative water depth.// | ||
Groups such as ostracods can also be useful. Other planktonic microfossils can give more generalised information. Combination studies of various palynomorphs (often referred to as “palynofacies”) can also give useful paleoenvironmental and paleoclimate information. | Groups such as ostracods can also be useful. Other planktonic microfossils can give more generalised information. Combination studies of various palynomorphs (often referred to as “palynofacies”) can also give useful paleoenvironmental and paleoclimate information. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | |||
+ | //Details of palynological components and their proportions in terrestrial and marine settings (courtesy of Katrin Ruckwied, Shell).// | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Palynofacies** - A term often seen in conjunction with typical biostratigraphic reports is " | ||
+ | |||
+ | The uses of colour in fossils to determine thermal maturity is covered in more detail here [**NEED LINK**] | ||
A combination of data based on different microfossil (or macrofossil) groups is the most powerful tool for determining paleoenvironments. | A combination of data based on different microfossil (or macrofossil) groups is the most powerful tool for determining paleoenvironments. | ||
- | Many foraminifera have reasonably well-known environmental and bathymetric distributions. | + | {{: |
+ | |||
+ | //Summary chart of the broad distribution patterns of the main microfossil groups (courtesy of Dr Jonathan Bujak, the Azolla Foundation).// | ||
+ | |||
+ | In addition, numerous statistical methods can be applied to fossil assemblages. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
- | Numerous statistical methods | + | //Shape variation in Operculina ammonoides is related to depth of habitat. Measuring the dimensions of a species assemblage |
**The Composition of Some Typical Environments** | **The Composition of Some Typical Environments** |
paleoenv_typical.1679307950.txt.gz · Last modified: 20/03/2023 10:25 by mike_gss